Monday, February 12, 2024

Brief Encounter-Nihal D Amerasekera

Brief Encounter – A movie masterpiece

By Dr Nihal D Amerasekera

Sir Noel Coward (1899-1973) was a flamboyant Englishman. He was a playwright, actor, singer and much more. Noel Coward was Knighted for his work.  He became famous for his song "Only mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun". Coward wrote the one act play “Still life” in 1936. This was a turbulent time in the world. King George V had died, and Edward VIII was made king only to abdicate. Germany was preparing for war. WWII shook the world. It ended in 1945 with the loss of 85 million lives and causing immense hardship to many.

The British film director David Lean (1908-1991) made the story of “Still Life” into a romantic drama, calling it the “Brief Encounter”. The film was shot in the final days of WWII. It was premiered in London in 1945. He is no stranger to epic films. Many of his movies had become box office hits like “Dr Zhivago”, “Lawrence of Arabia”, “Bridge on the River Kwai” and “A Passage to India”. David Lean is greatly respected for his mastery of film craft for which he was given an all-time achievement award in 1990. Brief Encounter is often referred to as the best movie romance of all time. It received three nominations at the Academy Awards, Best Director, Best Actress (Celia Johnson), and Best Adapted Screenplay. In 1999, the British Film Institute ranked it as the second-greatest British film of all time.

David Lean chose the leads: Celia Johnson as Laura - a housewife, Trevor Howard as Alec - a doctor. Stanley Holloway plays the naughty station master and Joyce Carey as the bossy, buffet manageress. Marital infidelity with the associated social and emotional upheaval is the subject of the film. Laura and Trevor both married to their partners and with children meet at Milford train station, just by chance. Laura got some grit in her eye and asked for some water at the station buffet when a kindly Dr Alec Harvey, came to help. That’s how it all began. Their affection for each other grew as they met at the station café again and again on several occasions. Meetings were always on a Thursday, she was on her shopping trips and he was there for his work commitments. Once they went to an afternoon performance at the Palladium Cinema.  During these recurrent weekly visits their casual friendship developed into something more emotionally fulfilling than either of them expected. After their breakup, David Lean allows Laura to deliver the anguished narrative, in flashback, when the doctor takes his family to a new life in South Africa. Her desire and longing for Alec only gets more intense. The heartache and despair felt by Laura is brilliantly portrayed. As Laura relates the story her face projects the feelings and emotions perfectly. The chemistry between Laura and Alec is exquisite. Their flawless sense of decorum and style all through film is a tribute to that British dignity and decency of the 1930’s.

The first colour film was made in 1908. It wasn’t until the late 1940’s when colour films became more common. Like most films of the early 1940’s “Brief encounter” was made in B&W. The superb cinematography in the railway station with the focus on low lighting and the loud announcements from the public-address system creates the ideal ambience for the story. B&W makes the images menacingly atmospheric. This also suited the story perfectly depicting a certain poignance, a place faraway and of a time long ago.

The film is etched in nostalgia to an era when public transport was the norm and cars were expensive and few. Steam trains were popular and ran on time. The noise, dust and the puffs of smoke make us remember that era of steam with much affection. The hustle and bustle of a busy train station adds to the urgency of their brief meetings. The camera eavesdrops on their random mundane conversations. The announcements on the public address system of train arrivals and departures conveys the beginnings and the endings of their trysts abruptly adding to the agony and the ecstasy. The emotional rollercoaster of the illicit affair is beautifully portrayed.

There are certain songs and melodies that are inextricably linked to films. They seem to linger in our sub conscious minds forever. Anytime we hear the music our thoughts are directed to parts of the movie. This is so with Lara’s theme in Dr Zhivago, “As time goes by” in Casablanca and eminently true for Brief encounter. The theme music that is played right through the film is Rachmaninov’s piano concerto No.2. This is recognised as an epic work of genius. Rachmaninov (1873- 1943) was a Russian composer and pianist. He composed the score in 1900 when he had recovered from clinical depression. He dedicated his work to his psychotherapist. The second movement creates a cloud of sentimentality ideally suited, in particular, for the important final scene in Brief encounter. After the Revolution he left Russia and settled in New York.

Human history is littered with stories of adultery since the beginning of time. “Thou shalt not commit adultery” remains one of the Biblical Ten Commandments for Christians. Religions, Society and even the current legal systems take a dim view of adultery. There are strong cultural norms too that discourage such behaviour. This film made in those censorious times, family and stability are respected and preserved. The moral of the story has remained consistent since the film was first shown in 1945. However, with the passage of years people are more understanding of how such a situation could occur. Unplanned, inopportune, and inelegant, this is how romance happens in the real world. Marriage vows are sacred, and the union is sacrosanct. We salute Laura and Alec. They both earn our sympathy and respect for their wisdom.

It is important there is a release for marriages that are beyond reconciliation for a multitude of reasons. A further discussion on this subject goes beyond the scope of my remit.

Although there is a loathing for adultery and extramarital affairs, people love to know and hear about it. The media are quick to publish salacious details. With the modern way of life, men and women mix freely at work, home, and social functions. The social media and emails on mobile phones allow secrecy and easier contact. This enhances the opportunities for clandestine relationships providing the climate for gossip and innuendo. Hollywood, Bollywood and film makers around the world make use of this human weakness to create gripping stories that become money spinners for them. It is now hard to find a movie without such steamy and sensuous details.

This film is a timeless classic. Brief Encounter grabs you from start to finish. It’s a great story beautifully told. The movie is a masterclass in cinematography. I have made a conscious effort not to outline the entire story just in case I have enticed a reader to see the film. It is a gentle reminder of what it is like to be in love!! One may even search the past for similar events in one’s own life. I have watched Brief encounter many times and have been genuinely moved each time. It still is one of the most cherished movie experiences I’ve had. 

14 comments:

  1. Thanks Nihal for reminding us of this classic movie. I remember watching it in Sri Lanka and enjoying it. I also remember the cigarette smoke and headache afterwards! Banning smoking in cinemas was one of the best things that happened.
    We tend to think of the start of Movies in colour as a great advance: it was but we must also remember that B&W movies gave us a cinematic experience that just could not be matched by colour: a lesson that not all past things have been surpassed by more recent advances.
    Nihal, you have touched on a more sensitive subject which deserves a response. Marriage is a very useful social construct in my view, it is not “natural”. There are many instances where in individual cases, it is the best possible thing, it is the worst possible thing, the best compromise, the worst compromise and cases in between! Controlling our “natural” emotions is one of the features of social cohesion in most societies. It is by no means “natural” and is man-made, for good reasons. A "one- to- one" life long union would never happen in “untamed Nature” as it is not natural, there is no evolutionary need for the purpose of survival. Religion and Legal systems also intervened to affect how we behave.
    Adultery falls within what Society decide is “right” but as I always say, one must never judge without taking into account context, motives and individual circumstances. In my view, there is no absolute “moral imperative”, just an acceptance of social conformity, for very good reasons.
    For those who may not have seen it, you can watch it on YouTube. Here is the link:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LguRis_h1qc

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mahen
    Thank you for posting my article .
    A legal marriage must have a place in society, although the union may not be for everyone. It is an important institution to educate and bring up children to become law abiding useful citizens of this world. I cannot imagine a world without a stable union to guide children in the correct path. Society will disintegrate if a suitable environment is not provided for the children to grow up.
    Something doesn’t have to be natural to be good and useful. Marriage is not unnatural either as we see the union in the animal world where parents care for the young and teach them. They may not have a marriage certificate to show for it!!
    Finding a suitable partner is not easy. Once that is overcome there has to be kindness and understanding and loyalty. It is important that the union is on an equal basis.
    There is always a legal process to walk away from a marriage that is not working out well.
    Being disloyal while in a marriage I find it deeply abhorrent.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nihal and others who read my comment, I hope you didn'tmisunderstand my comment about marital union! I agree with everything Nihal has said in his comment. I merely pointed out that a lifelong union with one partner is not "natural" but that does not imply that it is not good. Man has changed Nature for the good on many occasions and will continue to do so, and the opposite is also sadly true. My comment was meant to provoke thought and promote a deeper understanding, or a deeper examination of how we look at "offenders" in this area and also make us reflect on morals and how they are influenced by culture, time , laws of the land, religion and human ingenuity and harmony. Whether there are immutable and absolute Moral Laws is debatable and will be influenced by our own beliefs and faith.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nihal thank you for recommending "Brief Encounter." I think you have written about this movie earlier but I don't believe I have ever seen it. Mahen thank you for the YouTube link. I must watch it now.
    Mahen, you have started a thought provoking discussion on whether it is possible to be faithful to one person for the rest of one's life? I think one must have tremendous luck to find the "right" person. Many of us, especially females of our generation, felt tremendous social pressure to get married once studies were done and careers were on the right right track. I am glad that not all young women are succumbing to that kind of pressure any more. Marriage is not for everyone and we have to be honest with ourselves. (It is a lot of effort and compromise to stay married!) If one chooses marriage it is important to be honest with one's partner and call it quits when the relationship fizzles out. Cheating is not cool!
    BTW, Mahen, there are examples in nature where some species mate for life. Check out the Northern Cardinals. Some of them stay with their chosen mate for the rest of their lives.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Srianee
    Thank you for your comment. You are spot on about your thoughts on marriage.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just finished watching the movie on my laptop. Thank you guys! The black and white cinematography is so striking. It is a true portrayal of the times. I do love the old classic movies. It was fun seeing the Stanley Holloway character and remembering him belting out "Get Me to the Church on Time" in My Fair Lady.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Marriage, a cultural phenomenon. The number of partners allowed depends on the Faith, the Law etc, Here is a new happening in Finland:-Women in Finland protesting against men marrying only one wife. They want the men to marry more than one wife as the population of women continue to soar in their country without husbands.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Among the Mormons it was customary for man to have more than one wife. It was legal in the state of Utah until the early 1900s. Although it is illegal, the practice has been decriminalized. (Google tells me so!)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hello ND post, a warm welcome return to the top of the blog! It was but right to give way and give space to the unexpected demise of our much-loved Lubber; a character, unique and unforgettable and a priviledge to have known. Regrets are never productive but I must confess that I wish I had more contact with him in his latter years- my loss, too late but a reminder to keep in touch with people you care.

    Coming to the film again, for me it is a reminder of something I strongly believe. Simply stated, it is this. We cannot judge people on the basis of the "macro-picture" which is sadly, all that is often publicised or known. Conext matters, and matters a lot. Human actions are very strongly affected by circumstances which are often not planned or desired. What A does in the scenario "a,b,c,d,e...etc" may not appear "good" (whatever that is!) and could be accused of being a "bad" person but no acount is taken of what the accuser B , would do in similar circumstances. My mantra is that we form strong opinions of people who break social norms and do not give time to consider what you or a human being you respect, would do in the same circumstances. Good and bad are relative as I have said many times (unless you have strong Theistic beliefs which may polarise you). Murder is bad but I would not hesitate to shoot a person who is about to kill my mother, who would with near 100% certainity be dead but for my intervention. Human behaviour is incredibly complex, driven by genetics, culture, nurture, random events, predictable events with unexpected outcomes and those with predicted outcomes. I don't believe in destiny unlike my learned friend and to me destiny is something you know only after it has happened! This Movie shows how perfectly decent people can sometimes behave in a way you would not expect of moral beings.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mahen
    Thank you for promoting my effort once again. About Lubber and many other friends I regret not being in closer contact. But life gets hectic too at times which makes keeping in touch that much harder.
    As for your discussion on the film there is much to a story than meets the eye. The right thing to do in that situation too depends on their own family and their own lives. As I have said I respect their wisdom as they must have considered the pros and cons.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Nihal and Mahen, this is the kind of movie that I enjoy. Ones that make me think and raises questions in my mind; the quiet introspective movies. It is also fun when it leads to discussions such as we are having now.
    I attended a session at the Ceylon Literary Festival last weekend held at the Colombo Public Library which was entitled "Loved the Book, but Oh the film!" The panelists were David Hare, Louise Doughty and Shyam Selvadurai, moderated by Nimmi Harasgama. They discussed the fact that not every good book translates into a good movie, and the fact that many present day movies require action and dialogue in every scene. In the course of the discussion Louise Doughty mentioned an old movie where there wasn't much dialogue , but she said it was a beautiful movie. I found it on YouTube "A Month in the Country" with two of my favorite actors, Colin Firth and Kenneth Branagh, both very young at the time. It was truly beautiful. although I had to watch it with Spanish subtitles! I also found the Yorkshire accents of some of the actors difficult to understand. I may watch it again.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Srianee
    I agree with you that some stories dont make for good films. To go back a long way Alexandre Dumas' "Count of Monte Cristo" was such a superb story so very well told but the film was poor and didnt capture the mood and the situation very well at all.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Srianee. Thanks for your "thoughtful thoughts"! I agree on how a novel is at times produced in cinematic form without diluting the experience . Personally, I always try to read the book first and form my own images and interpretations. The other way round does not appeal to me as I keep seeing the cinema images and not my own constructions. Having said that, it is at times most enjoyable to see a film without reading the book. My general advice would be for a famous book, it is best to read it first.

    On the subject of B&W movies, I recall Psycho and To kill a mocking bird and Casablanca as three of my favourites. There were many Hindi films starring Nargis and Raj Kapoor for exampple, that I enjoyed in spite of not knowing the langauge. I am sure you have seen Shri 420 with some classic songs. On Sinhala films, Rekava was brilliantly filmed although the pace was a bit too slow at time. For example, there would be a beautiful scene while it was raining and the camera would focus on the drip of water from a gutter with great photographic beaty but... the drip goes on , and on and on...
    Mahen

    ReplyDelete
  14. I have written about the film Dr Zhivago on this blog. Once again produced by David Lean, the film brilliantly portrays the era and the people caught up in the revolution. The music once again captures the mood perfectly. I read the book so long ago and cannot recall it in detail but feel the film did justice to the story by Boris Pasternak which many regard as a sort of autobiography of that great author.

    ReplyDelete